Export controls

Security Guarantees in an America First AI Trade Policy

Balancing bilateral dealmaking , semiconductor competitiveness , and national security in the age of artificial intelligence

Kristian Rönn

CEO

May 21, 2025

Title

Security Guarantees in an America First AI Trade Policy

As artificial intelligence rapidly emerges as history's most economically transformative technology, the United States stands at a critical juncture. Within this Administration, we are likely to witness the dawn of artificial general intelligence—AI systems capable of performing virtually any economically valuable task. This technological leap could fundamentally reshape global economics, creating a world where specialized AI chips power all essential economic activities.

The Administration possesses a rare strategic advantage: control over who accesses U.S.-manufactured AI semiconductors represents one of its most powerful levers in international trade negotiations. But what precisely constitutes an America First AI Trade Policy? Four essential properties must be balanced to ensure American technological and economic leadership while safeguarding national security interests.

Four Essential Properties of an America First AI Trade Policy

An effective America First approach to AI trade policy must accomplish four critical objectives:

  1. Enable bilateral dealmaking leveraging America's AI chip advantage

  2. Ensure global competitiveness of U.S. semiconductor manufacturers

  3. Maintain the hardware edge for U.S.-based AI companies

  4. Prevent adversarial use of U.S. technology in weapons development and other security threats

These properties represent the foundation of a trade policy that puts American interests first—but balancing them requires sophisticated policy mechanisms. Let's examine each in detail.

1. Enabling Bilateral Dealmaking Through AI Chip Access

AI is becoming the most economically powerful technology in history. Within this administration, we'll likely see artificial general intelligence emerge—AI that can perform any valuable economic task. This could lead to a world where AI systems running on specialized chips handle all important economic work. The administration has a unique opportunity: controlling who gets access to U.S.-made AI chips can become one of its strongest tools in global trade negotiations. This is a moment for countries to choose sides: U.S.-developed AI hardware and software or Chinese. Not “both/ and.”

This advantage gives the United States unprecedented leverage in bilateral trade negotiations. By strategically granting or limiting access to advanced AI chips, America can negotiate favorable terms across various sectors—from manufacturing to agriculture to services. The controlled distribution of these critical components enables the administration to forge tailored agreements that prioritize American economic interests in each specific relationship, rather than relying on broad multilateral frameworks that often dilute American advantages.

2. Ensuring U.S. Semiconductor Global Competitiveness

Selling U.S.-developed and manufactured AI chips globally is essential for addressing trade imbalances and maintaining American dominance in semiconductor technology. The Trump administration's AI datacenter deals with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, worth billions of dollars, demonstrate how chip exports can significantly improve America's trade position. More importantly, if the United States restricts chip exports too severely, it will only accelerate the development of China's domestic semiconductor industry and other international competitors.

American semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD must maintain their global market position to ensure continued leadership in chip design and manufacturing. Restricting their ability to sell internationally would not only harm these companies financially but could ultimately diminish American innovation capabilities as competitors grow stronger. An America First policy recognizes that these companies' global success directly benefits the American economy and technological ecosystem.

3. Maintaining the Hardware Edge for U.S. AI Companies

However, if any single foreign entity gains access to hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips, they could quickly challenge the current leadership position of American AI companies like Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and Meta. These U.S. firms currently enjoy substantial advantages in AI capabilities, revenue generation, and capital raised compared to international competitors—largely due to their preferential access to cutting-edge AI hardware.

This hardware edge has been acknowledged not only by the CEOs of leading American AI companies but also by their international counterparts. The founder of Chinese AI company DeepSeek has publicly recognized that limited access to advanced computing resources has significantly hampered their ability to compete with U.S. firms. Maintaining this strategic advantage ensures that the economic benefits of AI development primarily flow to American companies, workers, and the broader U.S. economy.

4. Preventing Adversarial Misuse of U.S. Technology

Capable AI systems are recognized as a potential existential threat by the CEOs of all major AI labs, Nobel laureates, and the godfathers of modern AI. For this reason, it is critical that powerful AI capabilities don't fall into the hands of terrorists, dictatorial regimes, and U.S. adversaries. Scientists have warned that current AI models can help engineer dangerous pandemics, highlighting the concrete security risks involved.

While AI offers enormous economic and social benefits, advanced models and large computing clusters could enable adversaries and malicious actors to enhance military and intelligence applications, lower barriers to developing weapons of mass destruction, support sophisticated cyber operations, and assist in human rights violations such as mass surveillance. The United States must leverage its regulatory tools and authorities to mitigate these risks and protect national security.

Balancing Competing Priorities

A fundamental tension exists between the first two properties (enabling bilateral dealmaking and ensuring semiconductor competitiveness) and the latter two (maintaining a U.S. AI hardware edge and preventing misuse). If we provide universal access to U.S. AI semiconductors, we risk eliminating the advantage enjoyed by American AI companies and lose control over potential misuse by adversaries.


The solution lies in implementing a proportional access framework: granting access to U.S. AI semiconductors based on the verifiable security guarantees that importers can provide. This approach allows the administration to finely calibrate its trade strategy, rewarding trusted partners while limiting access for less reliable actors.

For this proportional access framework to succeed, robust security guarantees must be implemented to ensure that AI chips remain with their intended recipients. Without proper safeguards, countries could potentially request more chips than needed and resell them to third parties or allow unauthorized remote access to these valuable computing resources. Such leakage would undermine America's bilateral negotiating power for what is rapidly becoming the world's most crucial technological resource.

Several components are necessary for an effective security guarantee framework:

1. Access Proportional to Security Guarantees

The current regulatory framework establishes different control levels based on destination, end-user, and item sensitivity. While this tiered approach is appropriate, access levels (i.e., the number of imported chips) should be explicitly linked to the strength of verifiable security guarantees provided by the recipient. At minimum, verifiable proof of location within an authorized facility should be required for significant compute imports.

This foundational level of location-based security guarantees should apply universally, including to allies in Tier 1 countries and transactions utilizing license exceptions. Despite existing controls, U.S. microchips have reportedly reached sanctioned destinations via intermediary countries, including close allies. It is therefore essential that all countries, including EU and NATO partners, adhere to the same fundamental location verification requirements.

2. Development of Technical Standards

Collaboration between the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and U.S. industry is needed to develop comprehensive technical standards and reference architectures for crucial security protections. Standardizing requirements for tiered access will clarify expectations and accelerate the development of compliant solutions.

These technical standards should prioritize performance-based, privacy-preserving location verification while also incorporating other vital security measures, such as comprehensive data center security controls to prevent unauthorized users or hackers from accessing advanced AI chips.

3. Independent Third-Party Auditing

Compliance with security standards must be verified through mandatory audits conducted by independent third parties. These auditors must be distinct from both U.S. exporters and foreign importers/end-users to ensure impartiality, similar to auditing practices in the financial sector. This independent verification is essential for the credibility and effectiveness of security requirements.

4. Funding and Competitiveness

The costs of implementing and auditing these necessary security guarantees should primarily be borne by the foreign importers who benefit from accessing advanced U.S. technology. Furthermore, the development of innovative hardware and software solutions required for compliance should foster growth among U.S. technology firms, particularly startups and established technology companies. This approach supports U.S. technological leadership in the critical field of secure data center infrastructure and AI security.

Conclusion

An America First AI trade policy recognizes the unprecedented strategic advantage that U.S. leadership in AI semiconductor technology represents. By implementing a system of proportional access based on verifiable security guarantees, the administration can balance competing priorities: enabling beneficial bilateral trade, maintaining U.S. semiconductor industry competitiveness, preserving the hardware edge for American AI companies, and preventing adversarial misuse of powerful technologies.

This balanced approach ensures that America's technological leadership translates into economic and strategic advantages while safeguarding national security. As AI continues its rapid development toward artificial general intelligence, the policies established today will determine whether the United States maintains its position at the forefront of this transformative technology—with all the economic and security benefits that leadership entails.

By insisting on robust security guarantees from all trading partners, the administration can leverage America's AI chip advantage to secure favorable trade terms while preventing the proliferation of dual-use technologies to potential adversaries. This strategy represents the essence of an America First approach to AI trade policy: maximizing benefits to the American economy while minimizing risks to national security.

More Insights

Read More

Read More

Read More

Read More

AI security

AI security

AI security

|

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

Ping-Based Location Verification: 3 Deployment Scenarios

Countering 'Dark Compute' and Illicit Proliferation: A Review of AI Chip Location Verification Methods.

Countering 'Dark Compute' and Illicit Proliferation: A Review of AI Chip Location Verification Methods.

Countering 'Dark Compute' and Illicit Proliferation: A Review of AI Chip Location Verification Methods.

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

Read More

Read More

Read More

Read More

Export controls

Export controls

Export controls

|

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

Security Guarantees in an America First AI Trade Policy

Balancing bilateral dealmaking , semiconductor competitiveness , and national security in the age of artificial intelligence

Balancing bilateral dealmaking , semiconductor competitiveness , and national security in the age of artificial intelligence

Balancing bilateral dealmaking , semiconductor competitiveness , and national security in the age of artificial intelligence

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.

Proficiency in the fundamental principles of design, such as layout, color theory, typography, and visual hierarchy.